Capgemini Review as per Fresher - Azure Devops Engineer bei Capgemini: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
3. Jän. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good assistance in Trainings and Knowledge sharing. Supportive Staff as well as Management. Perfect Work Life Balance

Kontras

Being a fresher donot join Capg as we need to wait for over 30 months to get incremented and promoted which is a very long time to wait.

avatar
Reaktion von Capgemini
1y
Thank you for your feedback! We’re thrilled to hear that you found our training and knowledge-sharing initiatives beneficial and that our staff and management provided you with support. We’re also glad to know you appreciated the work-life balance we strive to maintain. We understand your concerns about the timeline for increments and promotions, especially for freshers. This is an important topic for us, and we’re continuously reviewing our policies to ensure they align with the growth and development of our team members. Your input is invaluable as we work toward enhancing our processes. Thank you for your contributions, and we wish you all the best in your career journey!

Mehr Bewertungen zu Capgemini entdecken

5,0
5. Juli 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Kontras

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1,0
30. Juni 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Kontras

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle