Average - Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Developer bei Capgemini: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
3. März 2021
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Average opportunities Leadership is okay It is like every other MNC

Kontras

Salary is not as per the market Getting project of your choice is quite difficult They will force you to get into a project of their choice no matter if your skills are aligned with the JD or not

avatar
Reaktion von Capgemini
5y
Appreciate you taking time to review us. I am surprised to learn about your concerns as we provide plethora of opportunities for our employees to learn and grow. We have robust career development pathways basis performance and potential which assure growth with us. We have dedicated Staffing Management teams that work on project allocation basis employee skills and project requirements. It is also imperative that you keep your skill profiles updated on R2D2 – the database for individual skills, which enables the organization to match relevant opportunities with your career aspirations and skills, and identify specific trainings for your career development. Do take time to share your overall feedback and experiences on Pulse. Have a wonderful #LifeAtCapgemini.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Capgemini entdecken

5,0
5. Juli 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Kontras

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1,0
30. Juni 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Kontras

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle