Avoid! Company is totally off track in Brazil, lack of ethics and professionalism from CPM Braxis leadership. - Project Manager bei Capgemini: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
14. Apr. 2014
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The only real advantage is the compensation and benefits. After the CPM Braxis acquisition in 2010, the company drifted and went completely off track with regards to ethics and policies established by the HQ in France.

Kontras

The senior leadership in Brazil is awful, some VPs are not fluent in english for example (which is unacceptable for senior leadership) and most of them are NOT qualified for the position. I joined the company in 2008, before the CPM deal and wait until 2013 for the HQ to take action, but they refused to replace the leadership 3 years after the deal. It looks like that France guys are too busy generating revenue from the Brazilian deal, and they forgot to keep the company running in Brazil.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Capgemini entdecken

5,0
5. Juli 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Kontras

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1,0
30. Juni 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Kontras

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle