It's a toxic environment where careers die - Validation Engineer bei Genentech: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
6. Nov. 2016
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

A position at Genenetech pays pretty well.

Kontras

Genentech and other bay area based biotech firms carry a reputation of being discriminatory and harassing toward women and older employees. To top it off, now that they are owned by Roche, there's a chance Roche-based (foreign, German) employees wind up being in project management positions in which they resort to old school yelling. It is such a wasteful company, there are so many upper executive level people and headquarters located in Switzerland that seem to contribute to nothing except too many odd hour tele-video meetings and higher drug prices with their salaries...if Genentech/Roche would force those people out instead of older employees wanting to wait a couple of years before retirement they would cut costs and probably get the drugs out quicker. What is even funny, you would think working for a bio-pharmacy-medical company you would get free healthcare with all the money they make, but you do not. Their cheapest, base level HMO is more expensive than Intel's, a CPU company (which is free, i.e. nothing comes out of your paycheck for that plan...this is true for at least the Portland metro area in which Genentech and Intel have a significant presence in Hillsboro). Maybe if they would get rid of all the waste and upper level management that don't seem to do much except look out for themselves they'd be able to afford at least a free HMO healthcare to all employees.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Genentech entdecken

5,0
27. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Patient-centric company. great culture & benefits

Kontras

Not always clear how promotions are awarded.

2,0
19. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The work is meaningful and overall the company vision aligns with my goals

Kontras

QA management has become inept. None of the leadership (aside from maybe one or two) truly understand the nuances of our site and jobs. They refuse to pay you more due to "budget" reasons but won't provide much information, they claim to be transparent but will make decisions behind your back and not communicate them, even if they impact you and/or your job. Leadership doesn't listen to feedback and gets defensive if you even try to give any. It honestly has become a game of politics only in QA and that's not really building any real quality culture.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle