Software Engineer - Software Engineer bei Capgemini: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4,0
1. März 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Capgemini is generally considered a good company to work for, with positive aspects including a good work-life balance, collaborative work culture, opportunities for learning and development, and a strong global brand reputation

Kontras

work will be hectic depending on project

avatar
Reaktion von Capgemini
1y
Thank you for your thoughtful review! We’re glad to hear that you view Capgemini positively, especially regarding our commitment to work-life balance, collaborative culture, and opportunities for learning and development. We pride ourselves on being a supportive workplace that encourages continuous growth and values teamwork, and it’s rewarding to know that you appreciate these aspects. We also understand your concern about project-related workload being hectic at times. While we strive to maintain a balanced environment, we recognize that project demands can vary significantly. We are actively working on strategies to better manage workloads and support our teams during high-pressure periods, ensuring that our employees can maintain their well-being even during busy times. Your insights are crucial as we continue to enhance our practices and support systems. If you have any specific suggestions on how we can improve the experience during intense project phases, we would love to hear them. Thank you for being a valued member of our team and for contributing to our positive work environment!

Mehr Bewertungen zu Capgemini entdecken

5,0
5. Juli 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Kontras

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1,0
30. Juni 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Kontras

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle