Good service based company - Software Development Engineer In Test (SDET) bei Capgemini: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4,0
16. Feb. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

1. Good work culture 2. Nice Team

Kontras

1. Salary and compensation 2. Micro management

avatar
Reaktion von Capgemini
1y
Thank you for sharing your feedback as a current employee! We’re delighted to hear that you appreciate the good work culture and enjoy being part of a nice team. Creating a supportive and collaborative environment is a core value for us, and it’s encouraging to know that this resonates with you. However, we genuinely appreciate your concerns regarding salary and compensation, as well as micromanagement. We understand that competitive compensation is essential for employee satisfaction, and we are actively reviewing our salary structures to ensure they meet industry standards. Additionally, we recognize that micromanagement can hinder creativity and productivity. We are committed to providing our managers with the training and resources necessary to foster a more empowering leadership style. Your insights are invaluable as we strive to enhance the overall employee experience. Thank you for being a valued member of our organization, and we encourage you to continue sharing your thoughts!

Mehr Bewertungen zu Capgemini entdecken

5,0
5. Juli 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Kontras

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1,0
30. Juni 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Kontras

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle