Great collaborative atmosphere and people. Good support and opportunities are there if you want to take them - Senior Consultant bei Capgemini: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4,0
18. Mai 2010
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- great people - very collaborative - great opportunities to learn - very supportive line management - great London location (Soho but soon to change) - great Paris based company university (if you can get time off client work to go on a course!)

Kontras

- WLB - lots of internal work required in order to do well at performance review. Deliver is 1/4 of scorecard and if doing long hours on intense client project, that leaves little time to do activities for the other 3/4s of the scorecard. Excellent delivery ratings and utlisation alone will not get a good score - On the job learning is very dependent on the project you are assigned to. Project resourcing is of the bus stop variety - whoever's on the bench. No pre-agreed rotations so best person placed in client job or to help for individuals to get career development opportunities they need - Technology is poor - laptops and mobiles regularly crash and mobiles are of limited choice and quality

Mehr Bewertungen zu Capgemini entdecken

5,0
5. Juli 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Kontras

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1,0
30. Juni 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Kontras

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle