Good at the beginning - Java Developer bei Capgemini: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
12. Feb. 2018
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Nice office, flexible working time(in most of the projects), mainly good athmosphere(unfortunately not in every project). Preety decent salary for beginners. Technologies in some projects are good, but can be out of date in the others. Company offers standard but decent benefits pack.

Kontras

Company is not a bad place to start Your career, but if You want to develop and learn, and You value good practices, clean code etc. You will not stay here too long. Company itself puts working code over good written code, so in the end many of the projects are managed poorly and the quality of product could be much better. Projects are flooded with unexperienced people, because they are simply cheaper. Computers that we get are terribly slow, and in many projects it is impossible to replace them with something decent. Company does not fire people, and unfortunately it creates perfect environment for lazy and incompetent people, that naturally affect Your work. In some projects athmosphere is terribly broken(f.e. constant mobbing and lack of respect from project managers - and You cannot work it out, since company does not punish people for such behaviour).

Mehr Bewertungen zu Capgemini entdecken

5,0
5. Juli 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Kontras

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1,0
30. Juni 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Kontras

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle