Over Promising & Under Performing company - Lead bei Capgemini: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
27. Dez. 2011
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

1.Close to city 2. Well connected with transport 3. Offers high salary while joining(but very non-standard)

Kontras

1. Under performing & has frustrated clients & employees in F & A BPO services 2. Political environment & culture biases exist(typical Indian problem :-) 3. In the regional context (F & A BPO services) recruitment is based on ethnicity of a person not qualification. All due to few foul fishes in the Project & Production management. 4. No cultural diversity hence hampering the over all communication system. F.Y.I Diversity is trademark of MNC 5. Non-transparency of information due to political and autocratic behavior in top managerial positions 6. Performance management system is done just for the sake of it, hence hampering employee career growth adding no value to experience just years! 7. People who harbor ideas or dreams(new joinees) of becoming a professional will find it highly dis-appointing join the particular BU I am from. You just cant look up to anybody to follow. And you are not allowed to lead. 8. If making quick irrelevant money is on your mind join capgemini. Else try finding some job where your abilities are challenged.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Capgemini entdecken

5,0
25. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good inclusive culture , supportive community

Kontras

You have to be proactive and show above and beyond quality

1,0
30. Juni 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Kontras

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle