Former good department - Fraud Analyst bei Expedia Group: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
16. Sep. 2021
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Big department with lots of potential in it's people. Good sports reimbursement benefit Free drinks and coffee Good culture and values

Kontras

No growth at all in the Fraud department. The company seems to be ok only for managers, which get promoted every few months and for Technical engineers where the lowest levels are set as high as managers in the salary range. Everyone below that is treated as a replaceable drone. Supervisors are either overworked by their managers or seem to be doing nothing but the minimum. Potential gets wasted with robotic trainings, thinking is not promoted or thought as a good thing, just reaching a number at the end of the month is all that matters, even if you cheat your stats to get it! Knowing an extra language is actually a nightmare of never ending asks of help, which is never rewarded, and it makes English speakers an elite that barely helps but asks a lot of other analysts. And all of that even before covid hit. Now, it's a little bit worse, the lack of promotions has made everyone over competitive, there is barely any teamwork among the analysts, the team feels very distant and divided.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Expedia Group entdecken

5,0
8. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good leadership and culture, good WLB

Kontras

Large organization means structured, slow moving processes

2,0
25. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good pay, supportive manager, and genuinely pleasant colleagues.

Kontras

Frequent reorgs and shifting strategic direction made it difficult to build momentum or plan long‑term. Over time, contractor roles became increasingly narrow and production‑focused, which limited opportunities for meaningful skill development. Responsibilities that originally included project management were reduced to primarily email production work. There’s also a broader corporate pattern where work is expected to be completed exactly as written, with little room for judgment or improvement. Even small, quick optimizations can lead to pushback rather than appreciation, creating an environment where going “above and beyond” requires multiple layers of approval — which defeats the purpose of being proactive in the first place. Finally, there’s an in‑office expectation (less strict than for full‑time employees, but still present) for work that can be done entirely remotely. This tends to benefit highly social personalities, but for those who prefer focused, independent work, it feels unnecessary. Social dynamics also play a noticeable role; if you’re not immediately well‑liked or you make a single early mistake, it can create a self‑fulfilling perception that’s difficult to overcome.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle