good company with diff experiences - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Expedia Group: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
3. Aug. 2016
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Nice medical benefits, pay for health club, decent vacation. fun environment with lots of events. Really good opportunity for interns -- some with no previous experience come in and land a good job with a well known company. Additionally, if you have a good manager, there are opportunities to grow and chose different roles. Lots of drinks, beer in the office (kegs even). Lots of food from events. Fast paced and overall good people that are a pleasure to work with. Decent pay. They are growing fast, have multiple offices and a choice of Macbook or PC. The new office in Seattle will be a stunning campus.

Kontras

Some departments are more toxic then others. There is existence of cronyism, politics and gossip. it is the first place I clearly witnessed pushing people out (making it miserable experience for individuals they wanted to leave). Remarkably, some less productive employees stay on board for years and float through the days. They do promote within, as per other review some of the managers do not have previous manager experience or were promoted when at Expedia to manager and sometimes director, having held much lower positions at previous companies. This of course can go either way - some seem well warranted others can be more perplexing. The new office in Seattle will result in a horrendous commute and won't help rent supply/demand = cost.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Expedia Group entdecken

5,0
8. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good leadership and culture, good WLB

Kontras

Large organization means structured, slow moving processes

2,0
25. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good pay, supportive manager, and genuinely pleasant colleagues.

Kontras

Frequent reorgs and shifting strategic direction made it difficult to build momentum or plan long‑term. Over time, contractor roles became increasingly narrow and production‑focused, which limited opportunities for meaningful skill development. Responsibilities that originally included project management were reduced to primarily email production work. There’s also a broader corporate pattern where work is expected to be completed exactly as written, with little room for judgment or improvement. Even small, quick optimizations can lead to pushback rather than appreciation, creating an environment where going “above and beyond” requires multiple layers of approval — which defeats the purpose of being proactive in the first place. Finally, there’s an in‑office expectation (less strict than for full‑time employees, but still present) for work that can be done entirely remotely. This tends to benefit highly social personalities, but for those who prefer focused, independent work, it feels unnecessary. Social dynamics also play a noticeable role; if you’re not immediately well‑liked or you make a single early mistake, it can create a self‑fulfilling perception that’s difficult to overcome.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle