ARE YOU SURE? - Associate District Manager bei ADP: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
8. März 2010
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

If you achieve your quota there is an opportunity to advance. It is a great place to begin a career (SBS). It looks great and is highly respected on your resume.

Kontras

There are two important refferal channels. One is banks and the other is CPA's. If relationships are not already established it will be difficult to succeed as a new rep. In reference to CPA's I don't understand why there is not a more adaquate program in place to build a refferal channel with them. There needs to be more actions and money spent on this channel not just "big talk" from management about how great they are and how to get refferals. More money needs to be allocated and reps need to have programs in place most importantly in reference to CPA's because as a new rep your so concerned about your number you don't always have the time to focus as much on them as you would like and with little direction that focus is usually placed on the backburner. Overall, not an easy job at all when it comes to prospecting very petty and not as proffesional as it is made out to be. It is a glorified entry-level sales position.

Mehr Bewertungen zu ADP entdecken

5,0
17. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

work life balance continued education opportunity

Kontras

segmented internal departments some unreasonable client escalations

2,0
15. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- Established company with a long history and relatively stable business operations. - Provides a sense of job stability compared to many organizations navigating rapid changes in the current AI-driven market. - Lower risk of frequent restructuring or large-scale layoffs than many high-growth technology companies. - Opportunity to work with experienced employees who have deep institutional and domain knowledge. - Predictable work environment that may appeal to individuals seeking long-term stability over rapid change. - Strong choice for professionals who value job security and a steady career path in an uncertain economic climate.

Kontras

- Documentation is limited or rusted, and many operational processes lack clear runbooks or standardized procedures, making onboarding and troubleshooting more difficult than necessary. - If you're coming from a modern, fast-paced engineering environment, the organization may feel behind current industry practices and tooling. - Internal politics can sometimes outweigh technical merit or execution. - There are teams with very long-tenured employees where change and innovation can be difficult to drive. - Decision-making often involves multiple layers of approval, resulting in significant bureaucracy and slower execution. - Processes can move slowly, and collaboration is not always transparent across teams, leading to inefficiencies and occasional confusion around ownership. - In some areas, roles, responsibilities, and operational processes are not clearly defined, creating unnecessary chaos and inconsistent ways of working. - Engineering standards and best practices vary considerably between teams, making cross-team collaboration challenging. - Organizational change tends to happen slowly, which can be frustrating for employees who are focused on modernization, automation, and continuous improvement.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle