Depend on division - Majors is great, SBS is good for experience but not a career - Major Accounts District Manager bei ADP: Mitarbeiterbewertung

5,0
4. März 2010
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The difference between divisions is staggering. Small Business Services is a great place to get your initial sales experience, learn to sell and make some money, but it's heavily micro-managed, intense and unsustainable as a long-term career (for most, especially if you're not able to develop strong referral relationships.) Major accounts has the support and tools you need to sell value and great opportunities for making a lot of money. ADP adapts to the marketplace (albeit sometimes a little slowly) so you can meet client needs.

Kontras

Trending a little towards mico-management since the recession. Many of the DVP roles are filled by executives from SBS who have a "matrix-mentality." Love tracking. Not all bad, but can interfere with selling time. Your experience can really vary by region and depend on the manager you work for.

Mehr Bewertungen zu ADP entdecken

5,0
17. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

work life balance continued education opportunity

Kontras

segmented internal departments some unreasonable client escalations

2,0
15. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- Established company with a long history and relatively stable business operations. - Provides a sense of job stability compared to many organizations navigating rapid changes in the current AI-driven market. - Lower risk of frequent restructuring or large-scale layoffs than many high-growth technology companies. - Opportunity to work with experienced employees who have deep institutional and domain knowledge. - Predictable work environment that may appeal to individuals seeking long-term stability over rapid change. - Strong choice for professionals who value job security and a steady career path in an uncertain economic climate.

Kontras

- Documentation is limited or rusted, and many operational processes lack clear runbooks or standardized procedures, making onboarding and troubleshooting more difficult than necessary. - If you're coming from a modern, fast-paced engineering environment, the organization may feel behind current industry practices and tooling. - Internal politics can sometimes outweigh technical merit or execution. - There are teams with very long-tenured employees where change and innovation can be difficult to drive. - Decision-making often involves multiple layers of approval, resulting in significant bureaucracy and slower execution. - Processes can move slowly, and collaboration is not always transparent across teams, leading to inefficiencies and occasional confusion around ownership. - In some areas, roles, responsibilities, and operational processes are not clearly defined, creating unnecessary chaos and inconsistent ways of working. - Engineering standards and best practices vary considerably between teams, making cross-team collaboration challenging. - Organizational change tends to happen slowly, which can be frustrating for employees who are focused on modernization, automation, and continuous improvement.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle