Toxic US Management; US needs to focus on safety and merit. - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Wacker: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
15. Aug. 2023
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Willing to recognize A players and put them in places for potential success - provided it doesn't risk any of US leadership's golden children. Pay is relatively good.

Kontras

The US organization's leadership is unbelievably toxic and does little else than create distractions. Local management should facilitate business - not inhibit it or distract from it. The inner politics at the US executive level are often-times all consuming and generate completely unnecessary noise, stress, and inter-department tensions. One of the side effects of this is that hand-picked favorites (without legitimate merit) get put in increasingly elevated positions. Historically there has been little focus on safety and ethics when it comes to US operations. This has been improving but the long history of this being lacking the US is a big deal. Those who know the history of the CHA site understand this well. HR function is a constant struggle. Does not support the actual personnel needs of the business. Side note - Glassdoor asks for a rating of the global CEO, Hartel. Hartel is a solid leader and is doing great in his somewhat new spot. The rating for the US org's CEO would not be similar but has not been solicited as part of this review.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Wacker entdecken

5,0
25. März 2026
Befristeter Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Helpful communities within each team.

Kontras

Potentially a stressful environment depending on team.

3,0
3. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

People are great to work with

Kontras

Not a ton of internship support financially

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle