Major fundamental problems with company management and communication - AV Programmer bei Vision Technologies: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
17. Aug. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Despite my complaints below, I was genuinely very happy with the level of diversity as Vision. The leadership that I interacted with was far more diverse than is typical in this industry and I happily worked along side people of all ethnicities, genders, backgrounds, and cultures throughout the company. For my position at least the pay was great.

Kontras

TURNOVER: Constant and continuous turnover in personnel and management makes it impossible to build relationships and have any consistency in or quality of work. In my year at Vision personnel in the following positions left the company: HR director, Field Operations Director, ALL AV field engineers, Sr. AV Programmer, another Field Operations Director, BOTH company presidents, most (all?) service technicians, and more project managers than I can even count. NO COMMUNICATION: Communication is nonexistent and there is 0 effort to provide critical information required to complete tasks. I was very often sent to sites without any knowledge of the customer, system to be worked on, or even the reason for being sent there. BAIT AND SWITCH: Despite being hired as an AV Programmer, in my entire year+ with Vision I only fully programmed a single system of my own. Instead, nearly my entire time with the company was spent working in field engineer or service tech roles (since all of them quit) to the point that I'm now significantly out of practice and am a worse programmer now than when I started with the company. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: As part of the recent realignment of the company's business units, Project Managers are now responsible for approving time. Project Managers are also paid commission on project performance. This presents a massive conflict of interest and has created an adversarial environment where PMs are cutting project hours and aggressively denying the time and work submitted to their projects to line their pockets. This results in rushed, incomplete, and badly turned over projects that have to be fixed by Service and the Field Engineers, angry clients, and generally very poor work. HORRIBLE WORK/LIFE BALANCE: After all of the field engineers quit, I was driving 2-1/2hrs+ each way to client sites in NOVA daily for months at a time to commission and service systems in various states of completion. This had significant effects on my mental and physical health and is further indicative of the "bait and switch" nature of my position at Vision.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Vision Technologies entdecken

5,0
17. Juli 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Competitive compensation, great office morale working with people who are passionate about their jobs. Leadership seems to make solid attempts to promote company culture and cares to drive improvements within. I can say this is the best company I've ever worked for, and I am so happy to land at Vision!

Kontras

The ERP system doesn't fit the company and was left behind by the old guard, unfortunately, but I can see the efforts made to listen and make changes for the better.

1,0
31. Okt. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

There are still talented individuals throughout the organization doing meaningful work. The company has the potential to be an industry leader if it embraces modern leadership principles and equity-focused practices.

Kontras

One of the most significant challenges facing the company is its legacy leadership. A senior leader—whose influence spans many years—is a core reason for the continued decline in morale, culture, and employee retention. Despite being positioned as a figure of stability, this individual lacks the leadership qualities needed to inspire, develop, and retain high-performing teams. Promotions and career advancement do not appear to be based on merit. Instead, favoritism plays a major role in who moves up, regardless of qualifications or performance. This has created a culture where hard work and results often go unrewarded if one is not within the favored inner circle. Moreover, there is a noticeable imbalance when it comes to promoting individuals across gender and ethnic lines. The lack of transparency and fairness in these decisions has led to a perception—rightfully so—of systemic bias. This not only limits the company’s ability to retain diverse talent, but also weakens the credibility of its leadership structure.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle