Motor claims handler - Motor Claims Handler bei Verisk: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4,0
28. Aug. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Working from home 3 days a week, flexibility, buy and sell annual leave, listen to music in the office whilst working(relaxed environment)

Kontras

Lots of process changes and constant targets and audits to hit. Hard to hit target with so many process changes.

avatar
Reaktion von Verisk
9mo
Hello, thanks for sending us your insights. We appreciate your feedback and are glad to hear you’ve appreciated the flexibility of the hybrid work model, the relaxed office environment, and the ability to personalize your workspace—these are all important aspects of creating a positive and balanced work culture. Your feedback and concerns are noted and help us in our commitment to continuous improvement. If you're open to it, we would appreciate the opportunity to discuss your experience in more detail. Please reach out to our HR department so we can better understand and address your concerns.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Verisk entdecken

5,0
30. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Kontras

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2,0
30. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Kontras

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle