Good stepping stone, not the place to build your career. - Therapist bei The Help Group: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
14. Okt. 2014
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Providing mental health services to those who may not otherwise receive or be eligible for such services was very appealing to me. Also, being able to give back and contribute to your community is very rewarding, (albeit not financially). Colleagues are knowledgeable, passionate about their work and genuinely invested in the well being of their clients.

Kontras

The morale of those working on the DMH side is laughable at best. Most therapists feel resentful of management, angry with the ridiculous demands of the job and discouraged with the mental health field. Not to mention, the pay is in no way "competitive" unless you speak Spanish. I think we all understand that working for a non profit agency does not equal rolling in the money, but what they pay us as therapists in no way reflects the amount of work that we do. The Help Group treats their employees like crap and does virtually nothing to improve the declining morale of the office. The "clinical supervisors" provide little (if any at all) clinical guidance, and unfortunately, do not advocate for their staff. The focus of clinical supervision is soley on paperwork (I understand that DMH paperwork is an important part of the job, but it IS NOT the only part). Management is seemingly interested in helping you succeed, but they talk to you about "where you're struggling" only out of formality and are not genuinely receptive to feedback. In addition, the weekly staff meetings only serve as a way to remind employees that they are doing a terrible job. The director of outpatient services needs a refresher on how to motivate employees. Not a lot of opportunity for growth and raises are limited. Benefits are pretty expensive and the free health insurance option is pretty terrible. HR is not very helpful as they don't understand the clinical work therapists do. Culture of office is punitive.

Mehr Bewertungen zu The Help Group entdecken

5,0
20. Apr. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

-Mission‑Driven & Meaningful Work -Opportunities to build experience in behavioral health, special education, social work, psychology, and counseling -Strong focus on diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility.

Kontras

Fast‑Paced, High‑Needs Environment - Builds strong prioritization and crisis‑management skills

1,0
29. Apr. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- Staff are dedicated and mission-driven - Employees work hard to support students/clients despite systemic challenges

Kontras

- Executive leadership: the CEO’s leadership approach is widely described as inconsistent, indecisive, and lacking clear strategic direction. There is no clearly communicated long-term vision or multi-year plan, which limits organizational alignment. - Lack of strategic clarity: Departments are expected to develop goals and strategies without a defined organizational roadmap, resulting in fragmented priorities and inconsistent execution across programs. - Disregard for expertise: Subject-matter expertise and licensed professional recommendations are not consistently incorporated into decision-making. - Program-level decisions are at times overridden without clear rationale, limiting effectiveness and undermining professional autonomy. - Lack of accountability: There are recurring instances where prior decisions are not acknowledged or are attributed to others, leading to confusion and reduced trust in leadership. - Misalignment with evidence-based practice: Data-driven or research-based recommendations are not consistently prioritized, with decisions sometimes driven by intuition rather than established best practices or educators. - Organizational strain: Leadership decisions contribute to misalignment across departments, particularly between therapeutic and educational services, impacting consistency of care. - Workplace culture: Employees report a lack of trust from leadership regarding productivity and workload. There is a significant gap between expectations and actual capacity, contributing to burnout. - Ineffective communication and conflict avoidance: Difficult decisions are often delegated to mid-level staff rather than communicated directly by executive leadership, placing unnecessary strain on teams.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle