Toxic culture - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei The Full Frame Initiative: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
26. Mai 2022
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

-Flexible work environment -Decent pay

Kontras

-Staff have no power -CEO is unable/unwilling to accept any feedback -Founder-centric environment meaning the Founder/CEO wants to be involved in every little detail to the point where it stalls progress on projects/programs and creates more obstacles for staff to get anything done -No trust in staff to do their job -There is significant wage disparity between leadership and non leadership, more than typically seen at nonprofits -Staff aren't allowed any communication with the Board of Directors -Very few opportunities for growth

Mehr Bewertungen zu The Full Frame Initiative entdecken

5,0
26. Sep. 2023
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great team environment with strong relationships, even virtually. Leadership encourages growth, not just productivity, and allows for all opinions to be heard. We're constantly improving how we do work together for the betterment of the movement and ourselves.

Kontras

It's a small nonprofit, workload is always high.

1
1,0
12. Feb. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The only pro I can think of is if this organization shutters and stops parachuting into broken communities claiming to be this new change that will rethink systems.

Kontras

If “try hard” was an organization, this one would be it. The founder is so far removed from how toxic her leadership is for employees below her. Leadership is nothing but a clueless shield and the org itself is all talk and no real action. It’s yet another organization using marginalized groups to perpetuate an endless cycle of harm for money. They don’t want to fix the problem as long as they can profit off of it.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle