This place is a sinking ship! - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Stoneridge Software: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
13. Aug. 2025
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Remote work and good people to collaborate with.

Kontras

Limited opportunities for career advancement. The culture has declined and no initiative to make changes. Several layoffs and lack of raises does not encourage long term employees to want to stay.

avatar
Reaktion von Stoneridge Software
6mo
We had a slow start to the year in 2025 and needed to make some tough decisions for the health of the business, including a reorganization that is setting us up for the future. These were not easy changes to make and they had profound impact on many people which is an outcome we certainly wished we could've avoided. The reorganization was extensively planned and is helping the company to be in a better position. As you said, the challenge has been lack of sales/growth, and that has turned around and we are looking at a strong 2026. Many, many consulting organizations experienced a tough 2025 and we were not immune to it but I'm excited about where we are heading going forward. Eric Newell, CEO

Mehr Bewertungen zu Stoneridge Software entdecken

5,0
17. März 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- Benefits - Flexibility - People

Kontras

No cons at this time.

avatar
Reaktion von Stoneridge Software
1mo
Thank you for the review - we appreciate the positive feedback! Eric Newell - CEO
1,0
17. Sep. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- A few genuinely talented individuals who care about their work and try to do the right thing. - Exposure to complex projects—though access is tightly controlled by an inner circle. - Strong branding and external messaging that gives the illusion of a progressive, people-first culture.

Kontras

- A protected clique monopolizes premium projects while others are handed troubled clients and projects in a troubled state - PIPs are weaponized—not used for development, but as quiet termination tools with little to no prior feedback. HR is not neutral here, - Micromanagement is extreme, with certain managers monitoring every move and relying on informal “reporting networks” to control narratives. - Confidential conversations are routinely breached and used against employees. - Leadership enables dysfunction, rewarding loyalty over competence and protecting toxic behavior. -Other backgrounds and leadership experience is routinely dismissed or ignored, especially if it challenges the status quo. - Culture punishes transparency and rewards silence. Success depends more on politics than performance.

9
avatar
Reaktion von Stoneridge Software
6mo
I certainly respect your opinion and I have heard concerns about what projects people get assigned to but I struggle to relate with the other feedback. We can’t get into the specifics of individual performance situations, but the experience described here is not typical or aligned with our practices. Our managers routinely get high marks from their teams for partnership and trust, and we have a thorough performance management process that prioritizes our values and acting with integrity. Transparency is a hallmark of our organization (with the exception of performance issues) and we offer many opportunities for people to voice their opinion, ask questions, etc. I do anonymous Q&A conversations every quarter and I answer the questions brought forward so there's always an opportunity to share feedback. If you're willing, I'd love to hear any direct feedback from you - send me an email and I'd be happy to engage in a conversation about what we could do better. Eric Newell, CEO
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle