Avoid at all costs unless you want to hate your life - Underwriter bei Selective Insurance: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
24. Feb. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

-free food provided from time to time -hybrid schedule

Kontras

-Snakey team members that will talk crap about each other and then pretend to be everyone’s friend (Typically the older women in the office). -You are given a mentor but the mentors will make you feel stupid for asking questions (not all, but my mentor specifically). -Senior underwriters can blatantly disrespect people and get away with it because they are tenured underwriters. -No confidentiality when you disclose an issue to a manager (in my case, I went to my manager with an issue and she disclosed this information to the person I was talking about and that created tension). -You are constantly hounded to hit rate and retention goals that are ridiculous -You are expected to do extra work that someone else did not finish/miss if it’s your book of business. -

Mehr Bewertungen zu Selective Insurance entdecken

5,0
17. Apr. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Kontras

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1,0
26. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Kontras

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle