too many egos at the top - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Selective Insurance: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
19. Jän. 2020
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Some great people working here that made all the difference. Corporate culture tries for the most part to be inclusive, but much of it is smoke and mirrors.

Kontras

Too many egos in the top roles and also those poised to take the reins. If you make a mistake here, you're branded with it and you have it mentioned in your next 5 reviews. No belief in taking risks or failing, it's used against you.

avatar
Reaktion von Selective Insurance
6y
It sounds like you had some positive relationships with your coworkers, and that's nice to read. We'll pass along your points about a stronger approach to inclusion, risk-taking, and recognition.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Selective Insurance entdecken

5,0
17. Apr. 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Kontras

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1,0
26. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Kontras

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle