Great people to work with, Management could be better - Teammanager Operation/Maintenance bei Ricardo: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
26. Jän. 2022
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Its a great place with an informal culture to work, espacially if you are a rail enthousiast.

Kontras

Unfortunately it is a stock market company, which means that decisions are taken based on short term yields instead looking to invest in the long term.

avatar
Reaktion von Ricardo
4y
Hi, thank you for leaving your feedback. We are pleased to hear about the positive experiences you've had while working at Ricardo and apologise for any negatives. We'd like to ensure you that we take your comments on board and will also pass these onto the relevant individuals in the Rail business unit for action. We are always looking for ways to improve the relationship and communication between employees and senior leadship teams. We encourage you to speak to your Team Leader and HR Business Partner about the issues raised too.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Ricardo entdecken

5,0
3. Nov. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Employees often highlight great colleagues and a supportive team environment.

Kontras

Senior leadership / management issues: the feedback often mentions lack of clear direction, slow or no career progression, and mixed support.

1,0
8. Aug. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

-Opportunities for growth in technically challenging projects, especially in systems engineering and mobility solutions. -Some engaging tasks for technically skilled engineers, depending on the team and project. -Global presence and potential networking opportunities.

Kontras

-Toxic work culture: The work environment at Ricardo North America feels sterile and driven by corporate politics, which has a significant impact on employee morale. There is a noticeable lack of focus on building a positive culture or supporting meaningful change. -HR and management issues: HR appears to be more reactive than proactive, often prioritizing corporate optics over employee well-being. Management is more focused on maintaining appearances and controlling communication rather than listening to employee feedback or addressing concerns that could lead to improvement. This has led to a lack of trust in leadership. -Weaponization of systems: There is a concerning trend where internal systems and processes are used to micromanage employees, creating unnecessary pressure and reducing overall productivity. This has led to a sense of disempowerment among engineers, who feel that their expertise and input are undervalued. -Lack of meaningful training and support: Training for engineers is minimal, leaving individuals to navigate complex systems without the support or resources needed to grow in their roles. This has led to a feeling of stagnation for many employees, as the company does not invest in fostering skill development or long-term career growth. -Management and leadership disconnection: Communication from upper management is often unclear, and decision-making seems disconnected from the actual needs of the team. Engineers may find themselves working on projects with little direction or strategic oversight, which leads to frustration and inefficiency.

3
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle