Good people, poor management - Consultant bei Ricardo: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
26. Jän. 2021
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Very knowledgeable people, interesting projects

Kontras

No clear vision/strategy, desperate clinging to cash cows that are running dry, no incentive to learn/become more efficient due to focus on declarability

avatar
Reaktion von Ricardo
5y
Thank you for taking the time to leave a review. We really appreciate the feedback you have detailed, both positive and negative. We’re glad to hear that you have enjoyed working with our talented employees and that you find the project work here interesting. To address your other concerns, we know that it is important that we provide a positive working environment and that employees feel represented and led by a management team that they support. However, it is understandable that, with some decisions, employees may not agree with the company’s choices, but these are made in the best interest of our goals as a company. If you wish to discuss anything further, we encourage our employees to be open with their Team Leaders or a member of HR about their concerns.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Ricardo entdecken

5,0
3. Nov. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Employees often highlight great colleagues and a supportive team environment.

Kontras

Senior leadership / management issues: the feedback often mentions lack of clear direction, slow or no career progression, and mixed support.

1,0
8. Aug. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

-Opportunities for growth in technically challenging projects, especially in systems engineering and mobility solutions. -Some engaging tasks for technically skilled engineers, depending on the team and project. -Global presence and potential networking opportunities.

Kontras

-Toxic work culture: The work environment at Ricardo North America feels sterile and driven by corporate politics, which has a significant impact on employee morale. There is a noticeable lack of focus on building a positive culture or supporting meaningful change. -HR and management issues: HR appears to be more reactive than proactive, often prioritizing corporate optics over employee well-being. Management is more focused on maintaining appearances and controlling communication rather than listening to employee feedback or addressing concerns that could lead to improvement. This has led to a lack of trust in leadership. -Weaponization of systems: There is a concerning trend where internal systems and processes are used to micromanage employees, creating unnecessary pressure and reducing overall productivity. This has led to a sense of disempowerment among engineers, who feel that their expertise and input are undervalued. -Lack of meaningful training and support: Training for engineers is minimal, leaving individuals to navigate complex systems without the support or resources needed to grow in their roles. This has led to a feeling of stagnation for many employees, as the company does not invest in fostering skill development or long-term career growth. -Management and leadership disconnection: Communication from upper management is often unclear, and decision-making seems disconnected from the actual needs of the team. Engineers may find themselves working on projects with little direction or strategic oversight, which leads to frustration and inefficiency.

3
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle