There's Good and Bad - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei RectorSeal: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4,0
24. Nov. 2014
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

9/80 Flex Work Schedule (Tardiness depends on if you're hourly or salary, job function, and who you work for) Enjoyable and Relaxed office environment. Plenty of private offices available for employees of varying professional levels. The workload is manageable. Low turn-over. 90% of medical benefits paid for by the company. Management is responsive and ready to act on issues. Pension and Esop for retirement. The people (they grow on you after a while). Company expands through acquisitions and has steady and consistent growth.

Kontras

Old methods and Old ideas. Old ERP system. Management can be "by the book." No work from home option unless you're in sales. Some staff can be territorial. Asking for resources or inquiring about how someone does something can be viewed as intrusive. Some managers are territorial with their departments and don't want other departments sticking their noses in. The ERP system encourages information silos inside of departments. Sometimes you have to hustle to get access to information that is relevant to your job and others may be reluctant to give it up.

Mehr Bewertungen zu RectorSeal entdecken

5,0
8. Nov. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Several industry leading HVAC, Electrical and Plumbing Parts. Great people, culture, optimism and career growth outlook. ESOP-Employee stock after x amount of time with company. Get to travel and work with several RMS and reps

Kontras

I don't have anything negative to day about this Company

3,0
4. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The company is moving really fast with an aggressive strategy. There's constant pressure, but it also creates good opportunities to grow if you can keep up

Kontras

For a while now, I've been running into a lot of friction when working with other departments, especially Engineering. Simple things that should be quick often turn into long back and forths, and it's not always clear who owns the next step. This slows down our product timelines and adds extra stress on the PM side, especially when we're trying to hit tight launch windows. I have also noticed the team doesn't always seem that busy during the day. I've seen people from their department chatting by the side entrance, taking long phone calls, or walking around the building talking. When I need a quick answer or decision, it can take a while to track down the right person - especially in the afternoon. It sometimes feels like lunch breaks run longer than expected. Getting clear direction from Engineering leadership has been challenging too. There always seem to be a bunch of reasons why things can't move faster, and it often feels like the main focus is on protecting their own side rather than solving the problem together. At the end of the day, we're all supposed to be working toward the company's success - not competing to see who can take the least responsibility if something goes wrong. I just wish the focus was more on actually building the product instead of explaining delays. Another pain point is workflow and document management. Stage gate processes aren't consistent across projects, and version control can be pretty loose. Even the engineers themselves sometimes aren't sure which revision is the latest. This has caused confusion and extra rework on our end more than once.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle