The Experience - Marine Surveyor bei RINA: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
27. Mai 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

1. Excellent culture atmosphere. 2. Fast and Intensive training on the job. 3. Limited travelling abroad - for someone who doesn't want a lot of travelling 4. Good remote working culture (up to 12 working days a month) 5. Benefits are relatively good (car, expenses, mobile, phone number)

Kontras

1. Base Salary & overtime pay is less than the rest of classification societies and less than the desired for the responsibilities you undertake. 2. Fleet consists of very old (over 30 years old) passenger vessels resulting in many occasional surveys around the Greek ports 3. Bad management (micromanagement) due to the extreme overload of Jobs resulting in frustration and confusion between the employees. 4. The surveyors numbers and experience are much less than the required level for handling cases as difficult and delicate as the one RINA has - In desperate need for experienced surveyors. 5. Bad work life balance due to long hours (especially outside of working hours) to the point of burnout. 6. HR & Senior Management in general don't how to hire and more importantly how to keep their people

Mehr Bewertungen zu RINA entdecken

5,0
20. Nov. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

A lot of new opportunities after the acquisition

Kontras

Nothing to say for privacy

1,0
21. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Employees perceived as closely connected to the Italian headquarters and leadership culture appeared to have stronger long-term career stability and internal support.

Kontras

In my experience, the company culture felt deeply outdated and heavily driven by hierarchy and micromanagement. Meritocracy was difficult to perceive, and mediocrity often seemed normalized rather than challenged. HR support was among the weakest I have experienced professionally, particularly regarding employee development, communication, and transition management. Compensation was below market standards considering the level of responsibility and workload, while objectives were frequently perceived as unrealistic or structured in a way that made them difficult to achieve. The company promotes strong corporate values publicly, but there was often a noticeable gap between those values and day-to-day internal practices. Professional growth, innovation, and continuous learning did not appear to be genuine priorities. Employees who worked hard and delivered results did not always feel recognized appropriately, while cultural and nationality alignment with the Italian headquarters appeared, at times, to carry disproportionate weight in career progression and internal support.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle