Experience with good research and great colleagues damaged by frequent restructuring, changing priorities and M&A . - Senior Scientist bei Pfizer: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
27. Mai 2014
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I was a scientist at the bench who found lots of challenge, personally fulfilling research and excellent resources (equipment budget, reagents) for work. My immediate colleagues were great co-workers with a sense of team.

Kontras

Developing a product that requires several years to market is impossible with when reprioritizing, restructuring and site closures occur every six months. There was churn in the personnel in upper management and there was lack of clarity of research goals in middle management. There was little opportunity for career growth for scientists within the company.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Pfizer entdecken

5,0
20. Mai 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Very good work culture and very easy going.

Kontras

Not enough work to do as an intern/co-op

2,0
3. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

A good amount of remote monitoring, which depending on how you view can be a positive.

Kontras

Changing systems and inconsistent standards are applied to people. There are many differing models that often muddy how you are supposed to do your job, especially when other staff members don't quite understand. How do you interface with the changing models? There tends to be a lot of blame and foisting of responsibilities. Sometimes you can become overburdened with a lot of work, where people do not respect your time and think that their tasks should take priority. It is possible to be contacted late at night with work to do and then be criticized the next day for not being able to keep up.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle