Engineer - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Nucor: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
25. Feb. 2016
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great people for the most part. Money was just ok, steel in MS not good for a while.

Kontras

Some managers philosophy their way or highway, work/family balance way off (even though they talk about family alot). Place was very outdated although some new equipment. Needing direct supervisor approval to move jobs absolutely worst rule, good people weren't allowed to move.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Nucor entdecken

5,0
1. Juli 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

This is an amazing place to work!

Kontras

I do not have any cons at this company.

1,0
19. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

-Unique compensation structure that includes profit sharing and bonuses (both driven by company performance) -Exposure to a large, decentralized organization -Opportunities for long-term growth exist for employees who align with (or conform to) the culture

Kontras

-Base salary lower than market, however potential for total compensation to exceed market depending on company performance (through profit sharing and ROA bonus) -Significant gap between stated values (safety, collaboration, teamwork, family-first) and day-to-day experience -Culture can feel rigid and conformity-driven, with limited openness to new ideas or different perspectives -Extremely limited work-life balance with rigid schedules and minimal flexibility (including work from home options) -PTO is very limited, especially in the first year (0-5 days depending on start date) -Hiring process is lengthy and highly intensive, including psychological assessments that can feel invasive with limited transparency on how results are used and stored -Leadership can feel traditional and insular, with limited diversity of thought and resistance to change -Inconsistent culture and policy enforcement across teams and divisions due to decentralized structure -Limited onboarding, unstructured training, and poor clarity around expectations in some roles -Benefits are more limited than originally presented (single health plan option, very restrictive prescription coverage) -Communication and transparency is lacking, making it difficult to understand priorities and decision-making

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle