90% employees are way underpaid, undervalued, overworked. It's very sad. - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Merakey: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
15. Jän. 2014
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Working with consumers and individuals can be rewarding; however, you will not be supported or given resources. Some programs/departments have flexibility of hours. There are truly amazing people who stick around despite the cons below and do it for the consumers. Some truly inspirational people who unfortunately are rarely appreciated.

Kontras

Embarrassingly low pay. Bitter employees and management is a joke. Have a degree? Maybe two? You will still be offended by the pay...take a look at the salary page. People are making the same salary as they did in 2000. Lots of travel using your own car that isn't mentioned in interviews. As someone with experience all over the company, thinking it would be better elsewhere, the entire company (at least in this area) is a disaster. Unethical and unorganized. I could go on and on and on, but seriously JUST LOOK ELSEWHERE! Anything would be better. Anything.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Merakey entdecken

5,0
30. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great Company and I love individuals we serve

Kontras

More exposure in job fairs and hiring events. getting our company name out there with more social media advertising

1,0
16. Dez. 2025
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The mission of the organization is meaningful, and hiring managers genuinely value quality candidates and strong placements. The work can be rewarding when the focus is on making thoughtful hires that truly support vulnerable individuals. Team members care deeply about doing the right thing and producing strong, long-term results.

Kontras

Under new management, recruiting has shifted to a numbers-driven model where metrics far outweigh quality, outcomes, and human impact. Recruiters are now responsible for interviewing and decision-making while simultaneously being held to significantly higher, rigid goals that do not account for location based candidate flow or program differences. Time is spent submitting phone screens and documenting nonviable candidates purely to satisfy metrics instead of actively sourcing strong applicants. Being discouraged from cherry-picking candidates, despite hiring for roles supporting vulnerable populations is concerning and demoralizing. This approach reduces efficiency, negatively impacts candidate experience, and has contributed to burnout and low morale. The system feels misaligned with the mission and set up for failure.

4
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle