Great colleagues, leadership stinks - Senior Researcher bei Mathematica: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
16. Apr. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Mathematica used to be a place where people would go to make their careers. You are surrounded by very smart colleagues who work very hard. In general, it’s a very collegial environment with a strong supervision component help mentor early career staff.

Kontras

Senior leadership is tone deaf. They are unable or unwilling to transparently communicate with the larger staff when making very important decisions that impact the entire company. Leadership is bloated and overpaid. They were utterly unprepared for dealing with the second Trump administration. The company seems to be shifting from its roots in policy research to more of a data analytics consultancy. Thus, the skill set that they value reflect that shift. Several years ago, the company articulated company, wide “values.” However with the recent downturn in policy, research and federal contracting, leadership has turned its back on these values, opting instead to protect the company, no matter the cost. These values ring very hollow now that the market has shifted.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Mathematica entdecken

5,0
11. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great colleagues, 401k match, and interesting work

Kontras

Work life balance could be improved and more ability to move between departments

2,0
21. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

A flexible work environment that genuinely supports balancing family and personal life in a sustainable, healthy way. The people you collaborate with day to day are thoughtful, capable, and respectful. The work itself is engaging, with topics that are genuinely interesting and meaningful.

Kontras

C-level executives and senior management are operating with a dangerous level of detachment. They believe they’re fully informed and “clued in,” but in reality, they’re insulated from the day-to-day realities of the business. Information is filtered, inconvenient truths are dismissed, and signals from employees and the market are consistently misread or ignored. This false sense of awareness is part of the problem. It leads to overconfidence in failing strategies, delayed course correction, and a pattern of doubling down on decisions that aren’t working. Meanwhile, the people closest to the work—those who see the issues clearly and have been raising them—are sidelined or disregarded. The result is a leadership team that mistakes proximity to power for insight, while the actual state of the company continues to deteriorate.

15
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle