Supportive colleagues and meaningful work, but chaotic leadership - Data Scientist bei Mathematica: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
18. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Supportive and smart colleagues. Interesting and meaningful work. Incredibly flexible remote work policy.

Kontras

Out of touch and reactive leadership. Unsustainable workloads (especially after multiple rounds of RIFs) leading to frequent burnout. Chaotic internal dynamics after restructuring business units in 2025. Uncertain federal work pipeline.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Mathematica entdecken

5,0
11. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great colleagues, 401k match, and interesting work

Kontras

Work life balance could be improved and more ability to move between departments

3,0
29. Juni 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Smart people, impactful work. A real community.

Kontras

Poor strategic planning. Rather than performing real analysis and proactive thinking, leadership reacts to the environment. Strategy development and implementation at Mathematica seems like leadership throws wet spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. In the 2010s, it was predictive modeling. Rather than proactively using predictive modeling to support their client's goals and the organization's mission, they created a data analytics division, hired smart people, and provided no guidance to support the division. Today, AI has replaced predictive modeling. These examples provide two instances of failures of corporate leadership; many more exist. Unfortunately, the company suffers from short-term incentives and an aversion to long-term investments. As an employee-owned company, you would think that the board and leadership would be more responsive to the employees. No! Over time, they have removed employees' voices from decision-making and focused on increasing their own power and independence.

1
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle