Staff Scientist - Research Scientist bei Lawrence Berkeley Lab: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
26. Okt. 2017
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

It pays well. If you happened to be in a good group, you work may be reward.

Kontras

1. Hard to be a good scientist when they EH&S department is totally out of control. Scientists spend more time on mindless compliance than on science itself. 2. What counts is how many papers you publish in good journals. Nothing else matters. 3. Politics is pervasive. Infighting is insense. You well need to engage in one-on-one knife fights to get your funding (figuratively speaking) The atmosphere in a big center like JCAP is toxic. The place is ruled by professors. If you are not one, it is almost impossible to move up. 4. Over half its funding is for renewable energy R&D. With Trump and Rick Perry in charge, that's all going away. I predict some very painful years ahead.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Lawrence Berkeley Lab entdecken

5,0
26. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

great work place to do research

Kontras

need less micro management and trust the eployee

5,0
21. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Opportunity to work on impactful scientific and engineering projects that support research and innovation. Exposure to multidisciplinary teams, including engineers, scientists, technicians, and project managers. Strong focus on safety, quality, and technical excellence. Good work-life balance and professional development opportunities. Ability to contribute to long-term projects with significant national and scientific importance.

Kontras

Large organizations can have multiple layers of review and approval, which may slow decision-making. Processes and documentation requirements can be extensive, especially for safety and compliance purposes. Project priorities can shift based on funding and organizational needs, requiring flexibility and adaptability.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle