LBNL Scientific wellfare program - Staff Scientist bei Lawrence Berkeley Lab: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
9. Nov. 2011
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good UC benefits which are about to be cut. Complete freedom to do what you want without fear of management interference. Some scientists are first rate.

Kontras

No chance for promotion or recognition. Laboratory fails to review employee performance despite DOE contract responsibility to do so. Plenty of deadwood. Arrogance of senior staff is oppressive. Lab likely to be closed in the future and turned over to UC Berkeley.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Lawrence Berkeley Lab entdecken

5,0
26. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

great work place to do research

Kontras

need less micro management and trust the eployee

5,0
21. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Opportunity to work on impactful scientific and engineering projects that support research and innovation. Exposure to multidisciplinary teams, including engineers, scientists, technicians, and project managers. Strong focus on safety, quality, and technical excellence. Good work-life balance and professional development opportunities. Ability to contribute to long-term projects with significant national and scientific importance.

Kontras

Large organizations can have multiple layers of review and approval, which may slow decision-making. Processes and documentation requirements can be extensive, especially for safety and compliance purposes. Project priorities can shift based on funding and organizational needs, requiring flexibility and adaptability.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle