Good people to work with, bad client and questionable management - Language Specialist bei Innodata: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
16. Dez. 2024
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Everyone I've worked with who works for Innodata is, with very few exceptions, lovely. There's a real culture encouraging asking questions and asking for help. Since the work is remote, there's also a lot of freedom to do what you want while you work like listening to music, etc. Getting hired was relatively simple, although it took them a while to get back to me.

Kontras

-You don't get to choose what project you're working on. I got hired for language work only to find out they had hired too many people in that project and I was going to be doing something completely different. Pretty disappointing. -Absolutely ridiculous metrics demanding you work 8 hours exactly and punishing you if you don't. -The tools the client provides break frequently and you lose production time you're expected to make up elsewhere. -The client in general has vague demands that change constantly and without warning. Even my managers and team leads have insinuated in so many words that they find it disrespectful and unprofessional, despite the fact that they're clearly not allowed to be more critical than that.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Innodata entdecken

5,0
2. Feb. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great place to work with consistent communication.

Kontras

Days can get repetitive and dry

2,0
25. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The vast majority of the people I worked with on projects for a major internet company were friendly and educated. The pay was decent for trivial remote work.

Kontras

Projects were tedious at best and seemed poorly designed. Rubrics designed either by the contracting company or Innodata were often poorly thought through, and rules tripped over themselves or remained ambiguous. The company we were sub-contracted to was infamous for not replying to inquiries asking for clarification for how to evaluate the AI. Prompts given to the AI were often incoherent--just a word or name, often misspelled--which left us making arbitrary decisions about how well the AI addressed the prompt. Rubrics were hidden from employees evaluating the AI, though that seemed to be a result of neglect by a company still figuring out how to run things, not an active decision to deceive employees. I left well before the recent waves of layoffs. Management had tried to assure us that jobs were secure, but that seemed delusional given that the contracting company was farming out work through other companies rather than hire us itself.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle