Conservative management works against its momentum - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Innodata: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
14. Sep. 2014
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

There's good support staff, and the large number of friendly overseas management makes it easy to cut through to problems and address issues. Benefits are reasonable, and due to the distributed locations it's possible to work from home to some degree (depending on position).

Kontras

The biggest hurdle for the company is their desire to move away from their core competency of data conversion, specifically in the publishing world. There is a strong push from upper management and the CEO to act and think more like a software company, but without the speed or investment to make such a change. As such, the projects that get the most attention are those with low risk and high reward -- which are rare, and take a significant build-up. Typically, winning and delivering these projects last beyond a single employee or set of employees, resulting in any momentum or internal software developments falling by the side. Compensation is a positive, but there is minimal support staff once projects are won from sales.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Innodata entdecken

5,0
2. Feb. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great place to work with consistent communication.

Kontras

Days can get repetitive and dry

2,0
12. Apr. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Some flexibility Work from home

Kontras

One thing I really didn’t enjoy about the guidance: our client sets a bench mark of having 85% “utilization”. Basically stating that of the 40 hours worked, 85% of that must be in “production code”, so about 35ish hours a week. The rest of the time can be spent reviewing emails, guidelines, etc. The project manager basically had management tell people that they could be 2.5 hours in other codes, and about 37.5 should be in production. If this is a decision from a client, then great, but it seemed to me the project manager was just trying to get every little bit of production possible out of people. I’m under the impression that if employees are treated like people and given proper breaks, the quality of work will be way better. If you force them to sit for 7.5 hours or a 8 hour day in front of a screen, the quality will be worse. The client says it’s 85% utilization, so why are we telling our employees they need to be in production for 37.5 hours out of the day? It just seems dishonest. Data annotation work can be tough and some of the tasks are repetitive and can take a lot of concentration. Half of the admin, forgets what it’s like to work in the queues, and drive these numbers blindly. Meanwhile, half of their job consists of chatting on teams all day.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle