Under Compensated - Project Manager bei Infosys: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
9. März 2011
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Relatively good work life balance for it's US Hired workforce. It's a different story for their imported folks.

Kontras

- Compensation is terrible compared to industry standard. First off offers are about 15-20% below industry standard. Furthermore, you'll probably end up making about 80-90% of what is offered in your offer letter. The compensation package includes many "variable's" that influence your overall salary. - Vacation time is terrible. Only 2wks - HR Dept is horrible. Terrible policies and too many layers. - Tech Support is aweful - Travel Compensation: You will inevitably pay money out of your pocket to cover travel expenses. They have a cap per day that can be spent for hotel/car. - ZERO 401k matching

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infosys entdecken

5,0
27. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Working for the manufacturing client

Kontras

Currently didn't observed any Cons.

4,0
10. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Kontras

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle