good - Software Development Engineer In Test (SDET) bei Infosys: Mitarbeiterbewertung

5,0
2. Juni 2023
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Very good company for work

Kontras

Getting always short terms projects

avatar
Reaktion von Infosys
3y
Thank you for your kind and honest words! We strive to create an exceptional workplace for our team members, and we are thrilled you have had a good overall experience with the company. We are so glad you’ve had a great time working with us, and we can’t wait to continue working with you! We also appreciate your feedback on the projects available to you. We hope that all team members can enjoy the projects they work on, and we are disappointed you feel unsatisfied with some projects. If you have concerns about the projects assigned to you, we invite you to reach out to your manager.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infosys entdecken

5,0
15. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Its a good company to work and grow in your IT career.

Kontras

I did not see any issues while working with the company

4,0
10. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Kontras

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle