test analyst - Software Test Engineer bei Infosys: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
21. Feb. 2013
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

good Good values. - Strong systems and processes.

Kontras

Weak HR policies - rather it has become anti-employee. In my experience, Systems and processes are enforced heartlessly, with direct languages in internal memos including some remarks such as 'if you don’t follow so and so rule, a certain deduction will appear in your next payroll. My personal experience was that the company's HR systems were not geared up to handle personality clashes between people. The manager is given complete authority.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infosys entdecken

5,0
15. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Awesome place to work as they are the largest IT service providers in India

Kontras

Nothing much cons of working here

4,0
10. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Kontras

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle