Infosys - the good and the not so good - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Infosys: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
10. Mai 2009
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Strong business model - still has room for growth Financially strong and viable company Strong corporate governance incl. good checks and balances A good brand name within the IT outsourcing and off-shoring vendors space Company aspires to always go to the next level

Kontras

Slowly the company seems to be becoming risk averse and too conservative - losing nimbleness and competitive edge Customer focus seems to be eroding Complacent middle management Not much work-life balance Compensation Benefits for employees outside India is not up to market levels

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infosys entdecken

5,0
15. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Its a good company to work and grow in your IT career.

Kontras

I did not see any issues while working with the company

4,0
10. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Kontras

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle