Sucks. On its downward spiral. - Senior Technical Specialist bei Infosys: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
26. Nov. 2008
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

none. nothing that I can think of. Was a good company once, but now its turned to he a hell hole.

Kontras

lots of things that bad. there is no growth even for good performers. all that matters for the company is operating margin and their brand image to the outside world. people slog at work for 12 to 14 hours without proper compensation. the global delivery model that Infosys boasts about is only possible when employees spend sleep less nights here in the US talking to the offshore team back in India (when its day time for them). Infosys does NOT compensate for this effort. Its expected out of the employees. They JUST abuse the H1B visa system. Shame for a company to do so. They just suck the blood out of you. the middle management is a total MESS and sadly as the company grows, these are the people who take more and more decisions.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infosys entdecken

5,0
27. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Working for the manufacturing client

Kontras

Currently didn't observed any Cons.

4,0
10. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Kontras

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle