I have been part of both good and worst projects... All I can say there is lot s to improve if senior management wants - Systems Engineer bei Infosys: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
15. Sep. 2011
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good infrastructure, overall personnel development, prompt action to any kind of disaster, work issues. Good company to start your carrier with. Lots to learn from scratch. Best IT training.

Kontras

Lots changes after training. Strict timeliness always at the end because of bad planning . Lots of rework . Fresher are paid the least as compared to the work they are allocated. Managers really put forward unrealistic schedule at unimaginable timeliness. A very very bad resource management by managers into a project. Only a few accounts are best managed here. favouratism by mangers, comparism between employees whicH might hurt employees sentiments..... HR are really very slow.. And they need lots to improve...

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infosys entdecken

5,0
15. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Its a good company to work and grow in your IT career.

Kontras

I did not see any issues while working with the company

4,0
10. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Kontras

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle