Growth Plateaued in 2020 and on the decline ever since - Sr Director of Sales bei Infor: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
13. Feb. 2024
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great people. They had top talent for many years. It helped me grow a nice network for future opportunities. SMB ERP space is the only growing area in 2023 - onward.

Kontras

-CEO is following orders since the Koch acquisition. Shed top talent and leaders during the 2022-2024 lay-offs. -No R&D and differentiation to the products. It took 3 years to showcase RPA/ML inside their ERP strategy with their OS platform which is not utilized by the majority of customers. -New leadership is needed to spark any change and impact. IFS and Epicor are steadily going to surpass Infor by 2025-2026 for these reasons. -Certain titles at Infor were a revolving chair and the re-orgs were occurring a few times a year. -I heard from the top that we had years of declining pipeline growth. That's alarming.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infor entdecken

5,0
27. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Good pay for area compared to other companies

Kontras

Some coworkers were low quality / low tier talent

avatar
Reaktion von Infor
1w
Thank you for leaving a review. We strive to make Infor a great place to work for everyone, and to create an environment where employees can grow and thrive. We're happy to hear that your experience at Infor is a good one!
3,0
22. Mai 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Kontras

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Reaktion von Infor
1w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle