An Exciting Place to Work - Senior Software Engineer bei Infor: Mitarbeiterbewertung

5,0
23. Mai 2018
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

After 33 years in the IT Industry, I can honestly say my past 18 years with Infor (Formerly Datastream) have been the most rewarding. During that time, I have worked amongst the most talented and driven people I have ever known. I have been challenged and I have grown and I have been granted autonomy based on mutual respect and trust. The learning never stops. And, I must say the last 7 years with the ‘new’ Infor have been the most impressive to me. I have seen Management Teams throughout my career that provide good direction but the ‘new’ Management Teams at Infor goes well beyond that. Not only do they have great vision, they actually make the investment to provide re-usable components and frameworks that all products can use in their path towards continuous improvement. For me, that’s makes it exciting to come into work every day. There is so much ‘cool stuff’ to be done.

Kontras

Infor keeps developing so much 'cool stuff' for my product to adopt, it's hard to keep up - which is a Pro.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infor entdecken

5,0
23. Aug. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Work is challenging and exciting

Kontras

May have to work on christmas

3,0
22. Mai 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Kontras

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Reaktion von Infor
1mo
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle