Not a safe place to work - Software Engineer bei Infor: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
28. Okt. 2025
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Coworkers have a family-like and friendly culture not sure if this is pros.

Kontras

There are bosses who give threats should we resign. They promote "speak up culture" but they will retaliate if you speak up. Someone also reported a harassing behavior from a manager but it was never investigated. You get promoted if you are close with the management. Last, they are behind in technology.

avatar
Reaktion von Infor
7mo
It’s unfortunate to hear about your experience, and we’re sorry on how it has impacted you. It’s the expectation that our employees practice and uphold our principles so that we maintain a positive environment. We do not tolerate harassment, and we encourage employees to speak up through the Koch guidelines platform without fear or retaliation from the management and/or HR. While you may no longer be connected with us, please know that you may still reach to myfeedback@infor.com so we can understand and investigate your concerns.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Infor entdecken

5,0
27. Jän. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great company culture, everybody very helpful

Kontras

Do not like the location

1
3,0
22. Mai 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Kontras

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Reaktion von Infor
1mo
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle