Quality engineering and poor HR - Project Manager bei Hatch: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
23. Mai 2015
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Great engineering knowledge within the company and focus on delivering high-quality projects. Good place to learn the ropes of EPCM management. Good benefits.

Kontras

If you're making them money on a project or specialized team, they will never let you change location or career orientation. HR spent more time time on my exit interview than 3 years of asking to find opportunities abroad. Associates and share-owners are a million times more important then regular employees.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Hatch entdecken

5,0
1. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

great work environment, very communicative and collaborative. Easy and open communication with PMs and upper leadership.

Kontras

need to be proactive to get work, especially if you're new. lot of travel, pro or con depending on your outlook.

1
3,0
18. Mai 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Exceptional project exposure across major U.S. transit, infrastructure, and energy pursuits — the portfolio and client roster are genuinely impressive and great for your professional brand The LTK Engineering Services acquisition brought in a strong, collaborative office culture that is noticeably more grounded and people-focused than the broader Hatch Ltd (Canadian entity) culture Strong brand recognition in the A/E/C space that opens doors with major public agencies

Kontras

Hired under the Client Action Team structure, which led to significant instability — multiple management changes in a short period with little transparency or consistency Overlapping time zones and regional boundaries create constant coordination friction; the flat hierarchy sounds good on paper but breaks down quickly when accountability is unclear and no one owns decisions Zero flexibility on in-office requirements — no hybrid accommodation even when the nature of the work doesn't require it Promotions are not merit-based. Advancement appears tied to visibility metrics like road safety observations and office attendance rather than the quality or impact of your work — deeply frustrating for high performers

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle