my exsperiance - Management bei Greif: Mitarbeiterbewertung

2,0
22. Dez. 2024
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

pretty relaxed environment, when everything runs smoothly, you're not doing anything and making easy money. pay was ok not top tier but livable.

Kontras

Very dangerous facility- everything is about 20- 30 years behind the times. Everything is done by hand and there are many areas and pieces of equipment that employees are required to work around that have major pinch points and honestly are a danger and shouldn't have anyone around I honestly surprised no one has died there. Along with the building itself falling apart all around you. If the machine breaks down get ready for hot extreme manual labor even if you are a salaried manager. There is a serious lack of accountability that is the fault of the management team not caring about really anything but the machine running. Quality and training and safety are on the bottom of priority. The management team is toxic not all individuals, but they are not a good team to be frank there were a few that should be hourly workers and not a part of the leadership at all. Knowledge of the machine does not equal good leaders. Didn't seem like there was any chance for advancement at this facility.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Greif entdecken

5,0
13. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Employee focused and safety focused

Kontras

Consistent Communication and training needs work.

1,0
7. Juli 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

- Competitive pay and benefits. - Some talented and supportive coworkers. - Good opportunity to learn if you enjoy a large corporate environment and structured processes.

Kontras

* In my experience, the culture prioritized appearances over honest feedback. Employee engagement surveys felt heavily emphasized, and I felt there was pressure to submit highly positive responses rather than candid feedback. * Leadership felt very top-down. Open disagreement or differing opinions did not seem to be welcomed, and many decisions appeared to flow through a single executive. * The CHRO’s leadership style was, in my experience, demanding and intimidating. Meetings often involved being put on the spot, conversations could feel one-sided, and it was difficult to speak openly. * AI initiatives became a major organizational focus, sometimes to the point where they seemed to take priority over solving practical business challenges. It often felt like employees were expected to enthusiastically embrace every new AI initiative. * Promotions and recognition did not always appear to align with performance. It often seemed that employees who closely aligned themselves with senior leadership had more opportunities for advancement than those who consistently produced strong work but challenged ideas or kept their heads down. * Overall, the environment felt highly political and very focused on maintaining the company’s image.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle