Rewarding and challenging place to work - Developer bei Floify: Mitarbeiterbewertung

5,0
19. Okt. 2020
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I've worked at Floify for around two years, and have found it a very rewarding experience. One thing that consistently impresses me about Floify is the ownership you're encouraged to take over your own projects. The typical structure of a feature at Floify includes both a backend and frontend developer working to implement something together. You're encouraged to plan out your own feature, find your own solutions, and work out any issues that crop up. Basically, it's cool getting to use the technology YOU want to use, as long as you can make the case that it's the best solution for your project. Other than that, everyone at the company is great, and easy to talk to. It's mostly work from home, which can be a pro/con depending on you. Floify does a good job of encouraging you to chat with your coworkers throughout the day, and we have frequent video calls to discuss things.

Kontras

Floify still seems to sometimes operate on a 'start up' kind of pace, which means I've experienced a bit of whiplash at times when priorities change quickly. In general, there seems to be a push toward getting a bit more organized to prevent that from happening so much.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Floify entdecken

5,0
11. Nov. 2023
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Floify treats their employees and customers with care.

Kontras

None really I enjoy working here

2,0
17. Juni 2025
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The people on the ground are incredible. They are collaborative, accountable, supportive, and deeply committed to building quality solutions. Peer-to-peer learning here was unmatched. I learned more from my colleagues than in any academic or previous work setting. Remote was helpful for work-life balance.

Kontras

Upper management demonstrated no interest in retaining experienced employees. Several key contributors left, and leadership made no meaningful effort to understand or prevent the trend. When legitimate concerns were raised about technical debt, unstable code foundations, or unsustainable product direction, they were dismissed, deflected, or shut down. Leadership showed a clear preference for short-term feature delivery over long-term platform stability. Direct communication about difficult topics was met with avoidance or, worse, retaliation. It took a public emotional breakdown from a team member to finally garner attention from leadership—an unacceptable failure in basic team support. Critical feedback was often treated as inconvenient rather than constructive.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle