Wholly Dysfunctional - Senior Consultant bei FICO: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
16. März 2018
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Sharp co-workers; remote/flexible work opportunities; solid salary/compensation; decent Fidelity 401K retirement plans.

Kontras

Zero work-life balance, consistent 60+ hour weeks are not uncommon; required client overnight, holiday and weekend events happen frequently and time is not reimbursed/compensated; absent company culture, especially for remote workers; terrible medical/dental benefits; behind the curve with internal tools and technology; annual bonus payouts are touted during the interview process, but not guaranteed; Director/Executive level management is solely focused on client billing and dollars, and exhibit very little to no interest in their team member's best interests; transparency, trust and communications is lacking across internal cross-organizational teams; rewards/recognition for doing great work is non-existent; burn out will happen. In summary, I wouldn't recommend FICO as a career choice to my worst enemy.

Mehr Bewertungen zu FICO entdecken

5,0
6. März 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Salary, work life balance, people

Kontras

Nothing much to say, all good

4,0
24. Jän. 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

FICO is a great place to work as a software engineer. I had a very positive experience collaborating with smart, thoughtful teammates on technically interesting problems that have real-world impact at scale. The engineering culture values code quality, thoughtful design, and pragmatic decision-making over hype. Leadership was supportive, expectations were clear, and there was a strong emphasis on ownership and accountability. Overall, it’s an excellent environment for engineers who enjoy working on meaningful systems in a stable, well-run organization.

Kontras

Slower pace of change compared to startups or high-growth tech companies, which can feel restrictive if you prefer rapid experimentation. Legacy systems and tech debt in parts of the organization that require patience and careful refactoring. Process-heavy at times, with multiple reviews or approvals slowing delivery. Less emphasis on cutting-edge frameworks—the focus is more on stability and correctness than chasing the newest tools.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle