In Desperate Need of Corporate Intervention - Talent Development Specialist bei Equus Workforce Solutions: Mitarbeiterbewertung

1,0
17. Juli 2024
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Equus has an overall great cause for the why behind their mission.

Kontras

Inflexible, toxic workplace environment, severe lack of training, lack of accountability and training in leadership, lack of care for employees, overworked employees, and very low retention rate. Not run effectively or efficiently in a way that actually benefits the overall contract. When you overwork people, have toxicity in leadership and office culture, and have very poor retention coupled with an unwillingness to do anything different then you negatively impact the company, goals, and people you serve. Employees do not feel heard nor supported by most of leadership and hear common phrases in the office such as "Equus is not for everyone" or "It is not Equus's job to make you happy."

Mehr Bewertungen zu Equus Workforce Solutions entdecken

5,0
13. März 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

I love helping families in my community and this job allows me to do this everyday. My co-worker all have big hearts and want others to succeed and grow.

Kontras

Staff turn over is high due to low wages. Expectations to gain employment is to have a B.A. yet pay is very little for the required education. They do not pay more based on your prior experience in the field. Orange County is the 2nd most expensive county in the united states to live and we make just a bit more than minimum wage employees that do not have educations or work experience.

2
1,0
11. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The role provides valuable experience in workforce development, compliance, documentation, and customer service.

Kontras

The biggest challenge was the culture and management environment. The office often felt cliquey, and it could be difficult for new hires to feel welcomed or included. Rather than embracing new ideas or different approaches, there was often a "this is how we've always done it" mentality. Ironically, some of the same employees who openly complained about the company, management, policies, and day-to-day operations were often the least receptive to change or process improvements. This created an environment where negativity became normalized but solutions were harder to implement. Training and quality expectations were another major frustration. Expectations changed frequently, but training and communication did not always keep pace. Employees could receive different guidance depending on who reviewed their work, making it difficult to know which standard was actually correct. It often felt like employees were expected to figure things out on their own while still being held accountable for mistakes. Turnover was extremely high during my time with the company. Coverage responsibilities were frequently redistributed among remaining staff, often without corresponding adjustments to workload expectations. This created an environment where employees were expected to continuously adapt to staffing shortages while maintaining the same performance standards.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle