Engaging work, long hours - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Devoted Health: Mitarbeiterbewertung

4,0
8. Dez. 2021
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Leadership here is tremendously smart and experienced, I am challenged daily Tremendous information and data transparency Great people to work with - Devoted hires for culture Flexible environment where you are treated like an adult and trusted to do a good job Free health insurance As innovative as insurance gets Being at a growth company is fun and rewarding - opportunity to make an immediate impact

Kontras

Poor work/life balance (biggest con) Frequently changing direction and strategy can be challenging No 401k match Some voices are louder than others and seem to drive the company’s decisions

Mehr Bewertungen zu Devoted Health entdecken

5,0
10. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

-Welcoming and kind employee culture -Support and strong project feedback -Clear communication -Employees believe and support the mission of the company -Enthusiastic, talented, and passionate leaders

Kontras

- There are two office spaces for hybrid work- they are great facilities but there are only two

3,0
4. März 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

The mission to serve Medicare members well was clear, and the early culture reflected that. Teams were empowered, different leadership styles were welcomed, and people were trusted to solve problems in practical ways. There are still many talented and mission-driven people at the company who care deeply about the work and about members.

Kontras

As the company grew rapidly, the culture began to change. Metrics have always been a focus, which is understandable in a performance-driven environment, but the emphasis increasingly shifted toward tracking activity and “effort” rather than measuring meaningful outcomes. Smaller assignments that once would have been handled with flexibility began to receive disproportionate attention, creating an environment that often felt more micromanaged than empowered. At the same time, accountability did not always appear to be applied consistently across leadership levels, which can be frustrating for teams that are being held to strict standards themselves. Frequent performance framework changes and constant iterations also created confusion and fatigue on the ground. In several cases, supervisor turnover concentrated under the same leadership should have been treated as a signal worth examining. Overall morale in parts of the organization has noticeably declined compared to earlier years.

5
Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle