Poorly planned merger - Mitarbeiter (anonym) bei Chubb: Mitarbeiterbewertung

3,0
14. Apr. 2017
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Some amazing people work here and still care about the customer. The level of creativity and innovation is high. The brand is strong.

Kontras

The merger has not worked. There are still two different pay scales and systems. Management was not and is not clear on which culture, workforce or systems will become the new Chubb. Instead they split the baby on all decisions arriving at the worst of both company. The desk employees are losing 30% of their workday to this nonsense and is getting worse by the day.

Mehr Bewertungen zu Chubb entdecken

5,0
11. Juni 2026
Mitarbeiter (anonym)
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

It has good people there

Kontras

A lot of time spent underwriting

2,0
22. Juni 2026
Empfehlen
CEO-Befürwortung
Geschäftsprognose

Pros

Business side is smart and is superb at their product

Kontras

The IT organization struggles with structural challenges that impact efficiency. The offshore-heavy model in India means US-based employees regularly work early hours to stay aligned, which is unsustainable long-term. The workforce is heavily weighted toward a high-headcount service model rather than investing in strong engineering talent — you need fewer, better engineers, not more bodies. Central tech functions are attempting to build platforms, but without a clear shared understanding of what a platform actually means, these initiatives remain incomplete. The result is heavy manual workarounds propping up half-finished solutions. Strategic direction shifts frequently, and ongoing layoff announcements make it difficult to plan or build momentum.

Bewertungen anzeigen nach: Hilfreich|Sterne|Datum|Alle